Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’? And Did Kant Think It Does?
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Hegel’s Ethics
My purpose in this article is not to offer any original insights into Hegel’s ethics, but merely to provide a brief overview that draws upon the most reliable secondary sources. In order to help organize the material, I compare Hegel’s views with the communitarian critique of liberalism. Following this, there is a brief account of the relation between Hegel’s ethical and religious thought. Hege...
متن کاملA glimpse of the impact of dyscalculia in the process of learning From Diagnosis to assess
One common factor among the general decline in students, poor math skills. To Nzrkvsk, mathematics disorder (calculated question) is math abilities Drasrasyb inherited Developmental disorder processes in the brain centers that math ability is growth emerges. Dyscalculia should be noted that the calculation does not imply weakness in practice, it is the perfect math skills and even larger (Alain...
متن کاملWhy Does Kant Think That Moral Requirements Are Categorical Imperatives?
In this paper I put forth three criticisms against McDowell account of the idea that moral requirements are categorical imperatives. I argue that McDowell’s account fails as a defense of Kant’s doctrine for at least three reasons. First, McDowell claims that agents can appeal to experience in order to formulate and recognize categorical imperatives. However, Kant strongly disagrees with this cl...
متن کاملMistaking the Map for the Territory: What Society Does With Medicine; Comment on “Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine”
Van Dijk et al describe how society’s influence on medicine drives both medicalisation and overdiagnosis, and allege that a major political and ethical concern regarding our increasingly interpreting the world through a biomedical lens is that it serves to individualise and depoliticize social problems. I argue that for medicalisation to serve this purpose, it would have to exclude the possibil...
متن کاملHumanity and the Law
The article by Professor Markovits 1 is thoughtful and careful perhaps painfully so but it simply and systematically ignores the human condition. The human condition is what law and law practice address, or, as they say these days, what law is "all about." The nonnative premise of Professor Markovits's analysis is that all realworld persons are equal. This premise is drawn chiefly from the phil...
متن کامل